Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play

104 Shares Facebook 23 Twitter 38 Buffer 12 Google+ 19 LinkedIn 8 Pin It Share 4 104 Shares ×

Facebook has been a popular topic of late, but not for the right reasons.

George Takei is writing a book dedicated to taking Facebook to task over the fact that his posts don’t reach all of his Fans.

Mark Cuban accused Facebook of driving away brands, deciding to take his ball and go home to MySpace.

It seems that overnight, every brand and Page admin joined the fight. “We should reach all of our Fans, and gosh darnit! We won’t take it anymore!”

The argument is that Facebook intentionally changed the EdgeRank algorithm to put the squeeze on brands, forcing them to promote posts.

Meanwhile, I looked at my stats…

Meh?

Slowly, a small number of writers came forward with an opposing view.

Brendan Irvine-Broque of PageLever wrote about why Cuban is wrong about Facebook.

Josh Constine of TechCrunch wrote Killing Rumors With Facts: No, Facebook Didn’t Decrease Page Feed Reach To Sell More Promoted Posts.

Brittany Darwell of InsideFacebook.com did the research with News Feed, EdgeRank and page posts: what’s really going on with Facebook?

This counter argument stated that Facebook actually made News Feed more efficient. During September, it became easier to report Pages for spam. Facebook then tweaked their algorithm to weed out spammy content. As a result, less of that content reached people who didn’t want to see it.

Reach, they say, stayed consistent overall, while engagement got a boost.

But these three writers are in the extreme minority. I’m talking 99-to-1 type minority. It’s not popular to take this stance.

I’ve written before about how frustrated I am with this discussion. That we’re focusing on the wrong metric (Reach). And that we have unreasonable expectations for the number of people we should reach.

But I’m not all talk. I want to bring some facts to the table.

So I’m opening up my stats. I’m tapping my virtual calculator and crunching the numbers. I’m ready to show you what I’ve found.

Some PageLever Data


Before I get there, I wanted to collect some evidence closer to a global view. I’m only one person with 7,000-ish Facebook Fans. No matter what I find, it’s an incredibly small sample size.

That’s why I reached out to Jeff Widman of PageLever. He provided the following chart that aggregates the data of more than 1,000 Facebook Pages with 10,000 or more Fans…

click to open rate 600x361 Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play

Courtesy of PageLever

I don’t know what happened in July, but you’ll recall in September Facebook did two things: 1) Made it easier to report Pages for spam, and 2) Updated EdgeRank to punish spammy Pages.

The result, as Constine and others have claimed, is more relevant content to the people who want it. According to this chart, Pages are getting engagement of one to two percentage points more than before (not considering the drop in July). In some cases, we’re talking double and triple the efficiency.

Okay, so now on to my research…

The Data Pool


I did the following:

  1. Exported my Post Level Data Facebook Insights dating back to November 4, 2011, the first day of my Facebook Page
  2. Removed the first two months of that data as not being reliable due to small sample size
  3. Kept all status updates, links and photo shares during the remaining 10+ months
  4. Removed any post that received even a penny of promotion
  5. Removed any post that was targeted
  6. Broke up the data into weekly segments, finding averages for those seven days
  7. Exported Page Level Data Facebook Insights to find corresponding number of Fans

If people like Cuban, Takei and their millions of followers are right, I’ll notice a few things:

  • A huge drop in Reach in or around September (some have said half or less)
  • A corresponding drop in engagement

But if Constine and others are right, I may not notice any change in Reach at all. According to their reports, the average Reach has remained the same. Some have been punished due to spammy behavior while others have not.

Similarly, the claim is that EdgeRank has been tweaked to more accurately surface content to the people who care about it. If true (as supported by PageLever), my Reach should be more efficient — I should get more engagement per impression.

My Page Reach


Okay, so you probably know by now that I’m tired of talking about Reach. There seems to be this expectation that we should reach 100% of our Facebook Fans even though only half are on Facebook on a given day, and most who are on won’t be when we post.

I hate the subject. It means very little. All I care about is whether I’m getting qualified engagement.

But humor me for a second, and let’s talk about Reach.

If Facebook decided to squeeze me and force me into promoting my posts, one indicator could be Reach. So let’s take a look at a few items.

Below are several line graphs: Total Likes, Total Reach, Total Reach/Likes, Total Fans Reached and Percentage of Fans Reached.

As you can see, I’ve seen steady growth since January. No big spikes, but a consistent upward slope…

facebook total likes jon loomer digital2 600x250 Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play

Total Reach has also maintained a steady rise since January…

facebook total reach jon loomer digital1 600x251 Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play

When compared to Likes, however, there is a slight dip once we get to September. Note, though, that this is Total Reach, not Reach of Fans.

facebook percentage total reach over likes jon loomer digital2 600x252 Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play

Now let’s look at Total Reach of Fans. Note that this chart starts on April 26, which is the first day that Facebook reported these numbers. Once again, it’s a steady climb. There’s an apparent drop during the final week of the report, but that’s immediately following the highest Fan Reach recorded.

facebook total fans reached jon loomer digital1 600x252 Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play

So now let’s look at the percentage of Fans reached over time. From June through August, I was reaching 16-22%. Beginning in September, I was reaching from 14-19%.

facebook percentage fans reached jon loomer digital1 600x254 Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play

It’s interesting because I never noticed a dip. That may be because it was actually rising, for the most part, but only the percentage of Reach was dropping. So this certainly wasn’t obvious.

But is Reach down for my Page? Yes. That could actually be consistent with both reports.

I had previously found that 34 people have reported me for spam. That’s not a huge number, but it could make an impact depending on how Facebook handles spam reports. I’m not immune.

While Reach is down a bit, I beg you to look at something: I’ve never reached anywhere close to “all” of my Fans with a post. I once reached 25% when Facebook first started reporting these numbers, but I’ve otherwise always straddled 20%.

We can also infer from the earlier data for Total Reach Over Likes that dating back to January this remained true. In fact, I was reaching only 22-23% of the total Fan count for a while, and that was considering TOTAL Reach (including Non-Fans).

So if you take anything from this post, I hope it’s this: You never reached close to 100% of your Fans. You never reached close to 50%. And at least on my Page, the most I reached was 25%, and that appeared to be a fluke.

Of course, I don’t care about Reach. So let’s move on…

My Page Engagement


Engagement is the money maker. So if Facebook truly is trying to squeeze me, we should see a corresponding drop.

If Constine and others are right, however, the drop in Reach will result in more efficient engagement. In other words, engagement should remain steady even if my posts are reaching fewer people.

So the first thing I want to do is take a closer look at Total Engaged Users, Percentage of Total Engaged Users to Fans, Total Fan Engagement and Percentage of Total Fan Engagement to Fans.

Before I get to the true efficiency numbers, I want to see how engagement has trended with Fan growth. I’ll continue to provide both totals and percentages since I feel that both tell their own story.

First, let’s look at Total Engaged Users, which includes Fans and non-Fans. As you can see, that number rose noticeably in July and has been high and steady since September.

facebook total engaged users jon loomer digital1 600x250 Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play

You’ll recall that Reach over Fans dipped slightly, but that’s not the case for Engaged Users over Fans. There was a drop from May to June, but it’s otherwise been very consistent between 1.0 and 1.8 percent. It’s actually trending slightly upward.

facebook percentage total engaged users jon loomer digital1 600x249 Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play

The number of Total Engaged Fans has continued to trend upward. In fact, you’ll notice a curious spike in September…

facebook total fan engagement jon loomer digital1 600x252 Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play

When taken over Total Fans, Engagement has remained quite steady. But once again, it’s between 0.8 and 1.2 percent since September, an increase over the prior periods.

facebook percentage fan engagement jon loomer digital1 600x251 Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play

So when I look at these charts, I see no noticeable drop whatsoever in Fan Engagement. In fact, I’ve seen a slight increase. This is in contrast to a slight drop in Reach occurring at around the same time period.

Engagement Efficiency


Now, I find value in the Engagement stats above because it keeps Engagement in context with Fan count, but I know some people don’t like them. So, let’s also find just how efficient Engagement of my Page has been.

Let’s think back again to why I’d be interested in this information. Facebook claims that they made it easier to report Pages for spam and then punished those Pages with an algorithm change in September. So beginning at that point, they said that Page content would more consistently reach the people who wanted to see it most.

And if they truly did want to see it most, they’d actually engage… RIGHT?

So now instead of looking at Engagement per Fan, I’m going to look at Engagement per user reached.

First, let’s look at Percentage of Engaged Fans Per Total Users Reached. This is quite clear. Engagement Efficiency spiked to 3.5% in July, dropped in August, and has been at an all-time high and straddling 4 percent since September.

facebook percentage engaged fan per total users reached jon loomer digital1 600x252 Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play

Finally, here’s a chart for Percentage of Engaged Fans per Total Fans Reached.

facebook percentage engaged fan per fans reached jon loomer digital1 600x249 Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play

Much the same here. The high was just under 5 percent in July, dropped in August, and has mainly been between 5 and 6.5 percent since September.

Posts since September have quite clearly been more efficient, generating engagement more often per person reached.

In Conclusion

Now, I do understand that my Page represents a small sample size. But there is a common theme here: Those who are willing to share significant amounts of data show either no negative impact or a positive trend in Fan Engagement. Those who shout about being squeezed provide very little (for example, the focus on Reach only).

So, no, I’m not Reaching all of my Fans. As you can see, I’ve never reached more than 25% of my Fans. And even though my Reach has dropped slightly since September, it’s nothing like the drop many are reporting. And I’m actually getting much better engagement during that time.

Is Facebook squeezing Facebook Pages in an effort to force them to pay for promotion? Is it now “Pay to Play?” They may be squeezing the Pages that are spammy — the Pages that deserved to be squeezed. But overall, I’m convinced…

It’s complete fiction!

Is your Facebook Page not performing? Let me help! I will review your Page and provide recommendations for how you can optimize engagement, leads and revenue. Go here for more info.
104 Shares Facebook 23 Twitter 38 Buffer 12 Google+ 19 LinkedIn 8 Pin It Share 4 104 Shares ×
About Jon Loomer

Jon Loomer is a digital marketing consultant with a unique perspective on social media. He was introduced to Facebook in 2007 while with the NBA (back before Pages) and has been using Facebook for business ever since. Stay in touch by liking his Facebook Page (Jon Loomer Digital).

  • http://johnhaydon.com/ John Haydon

    Jon – I’ve been watching your updates for months now. In my experience, you consistently publish useful, insightful updates. You’re smart about using images, seem to be one of the first to report news, and focus almost exclusively on what your fans want and need. Content is king on Facebook, as it is everywhere else on the web. Nice job, dewd.

    • http://jonloomer.com/blog Jon Loomer

      Thanks so much, John. You’re a big reason I am doing this. I’ll always remember the first talk we had soon after I was laid off. You convinced me that I could go on my own. I don’t think I believed it until then — and I might not have believed it entirely for a while — but that really gave me enough confidence to plow through. Thanks!

      • http://johnhaydon.com/ John Haydon

        Dude – you did it all on your own. I only saw your potential because I’m not you. :-)

  • Pingback: Fact or Fiction: Facebook is Pay to Play - JonLoomer.com | Social Media Community | Scoop.it

  • http://www.facebook.com/stefano.calderano Stefano Calderano

    What I found on our Facebook page is that we received several likes from people with several thousands likes, many of them given in a very short succession (one like every 5 seconds) to pages with very different topics. After wondering why, we realized we probably got people “swapping” likes, earning a credit for their own business page from any like they put on their personal page. Big phenomenon and anybody talks about that

  • Pingback: No Hard Sells When Marketing On Facebook | Affiliate Marketing | Niche Internet Marketing

  • Chris Hall

    Hey Jon. Good article. Just so you know, you may want to check out Promoted Posts data. I’ve run a few tests myself and it’s basically BS. They do increase your reach, but they are not targeting at all. You can choose “People Who Like Your Page” or “People Who Like Your Page and Their Friends” or “Anybody” Well, I’ve done the second one a couple of times now and I don’t get any additional LIKES on my page. I don’t get any additional COMMENTS on my post. I don’t get any additional SHARES on my post. I DO get additional likes on the post itself, but the people are usually from Asia. So, people from Asia are the “Friends of People Who Like My Page” even though 95% of my Page Likes come from people in the Southeastern US? I call BS! Check it out and let me know what you think .

  • http://twitter.com/ChadWittman Chad Wittman

    Love seeing people opening their data to get questions answered. Thanks for helping advance the community!

    • http://jonloomer.com/blog Jon Loomer

      Thanks, Chad! I wish more people would do this. I know some don’t want to disclose their “private” numbers, but I’m tired of reading generalizations on the negative impact they’ve seen and no hard numbers.

      Thanks for reading!

  • Pingback: Jon Loomer Talks... Episode #23 [Podcast] - JonLoomer.com

  • Lenny

    My understanding is that posts with great engagement should have more opportunity in the feed and if that doesn’t increase your reach increase chance, what does?

    I agree with the Cuban comments about the over optimization of the feed kills your decision making and flow like prioritizing content that has new comments, but that’s just me, but oh well, who have attempted before to make 1 billion people happy? lol

  • Pingback: Yes, You Have to Pay to Reach Some of Your Facebook Fans - JonLoomer.com

  • Pingback: 13 ways to boost your Facebook Page reach | Socialbrite

  • Pingback: Spotted: Is Facebook Page Reach Back Up? - JonLoomer.com

  • Pingback: Five Ways Facebook is Improving for Brands That You Probably Missed - JonLoomer.com

104 Shares Facebook 23 Twitter 38 Buffer 12 Google+ 19 LinkedIn 8 Pin It Share 4 104 Shares ×